United States v. McGibbon
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36744 (T. D. 34865).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Veces, Judge
This was an importation of comfortables in chief value of silk ndged with a silk cord.
The appraiser reported that the silk cord was “appliquéd all around the edge.” There are no samples and the case was submitted! upon the record. The “ 5 per cent ” issue is also here. The point, litigated is whether the articles are dutiable under the provisions, of paragraph 358, tariff act of 1913, as “ all articles * * * ap~ pliquéd, * * * any of the foregoing by whatever name known; * * * trimmings not specially provided for; * * * and articles made in whole or in part of any of the foregoing fabrics or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Walden v. Bodley's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Earnshaw v. CadwaladerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Imperial Wall Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Greenwald's Linen ImportersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929