Legal Opinion
Miller v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 5, 1981No. 53240PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The sole issue presented is whether the Corporation Commission’s [Commission] decision — establishing, in a forced pooling order, that a bonus of $75 per acre and a ⅛ royalty interest be paid mineral owners in lieu of participation — rests on substantial evidence. We answer in the affirmative.
The dispute arose in a proceeding on an application to pool the interests and adjudicate the rights of certain Ellis County mineral owners. The applicant, Kennedy and Mitchell, Inc. [operator], who sought the appointment as unit operator, requested that the Commission establish the bonus…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Bussie v. LongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Anderson v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Central Oklahoma Freight Lines, Inc. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Ranola Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Samson Resources Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Sundown Energy, L.P. v. Harding & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.