Legal Opinion
Henke v. Department of the Interior
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-2155PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
The background of this case will be familiar to those following news of the “Occupy Wall Street” protest and the progeny of protests it has spawned around the country. Since October 1, 2011, Plaintiffs Brett Henke and Laura Potter, along with numerous others, have participated in a protest, located in McPherson Square in Northwest Washington, DC, known as “Occupy DC.” Am. Compl., ¶ 1. It is Plaintiffs’ aim “to bring awareness to the[ir] concerns about United States economic policy, wealth disparity and the political process, through [a]…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bloem v. Unknown Department of the Interior EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Wrenn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bloem v. Unknown Department of the Interior EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ferring Pharm., Inc. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Williamson v. CoxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.