Legal Opinion

Bloem v. Unknown Department of the Interior Employees

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-2155PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Pro se Plaintiff David Bloem brought this action against unnamed Department of Interior employees pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). His suit arises from the well-documented “Occupy D.C.” protests, an offshoot of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement, which took up residence in downtown Washington’s McPherson Square during the fall of 2011. In an earlier iteration of this action, a group of protestors claimed that Interior and the U.S.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garlington v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Darby v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Graves v. Republic National Distributing CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Does v. HillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Randhawa v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API