Mueller v. Powell
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff’s motion to retax costs was heretofore sustained upon the theory that no opposition was offered to said motion. It appeared later that counsel for the defendants was unaware of the pendency of said motion and it was for that reason it was not resisted. It is fundamental that where a motion for the retaxing of costs is filed it is the duty of the party filing the motion to give his adversary notice thereof. 20 C.J.S., Costs, § 288, paragraph (d), page *745530. It appears, therefore, that counsel for the defendants was not advised of said motion until after an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spiritwood Grain Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Simpkins v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1894
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1915
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Barkhorn v. Adlib Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1964
- Mary M. v. North Lawrence Community School Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997