Legal Opinion

United States v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 22, 1939No. 6867PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit judge.

The defendant, Royal Lee (trading as the Vitamin Products Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin), appeals from a judgment which pronounced a sentence upon him after conviction by jury. In four counts, the indictment charged him with the interstate shipment of his product “Catalyn” on October 23 and November 2 of 1933, and with the misbranding of Catalyn, thereby violating Sections 2 and 8 of the Food and Drug Act of 1906, as amended. See 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 9, 10; see also Secs. 1 and ,7.

Counts 1 and 3 of the indictment charged that certain representations, pertaining to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Dr. David Roberts Veterinary Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Pfaff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard M. GeringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. Robert D. Pommerening and Cletus A. RedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. The United States of America v. Nicholas A. StironeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. AmorosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API