United States v. Miller
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Harvey C. Miller was convicted of violating Interstate Commerce Act Feb. 4, 1887, c. 104, 24 Stat. 379 (U. S. Comp. St. 1913, §§ 8563-8596), and, his conviction being affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals and the Costs being taxed against him, he moves to retax the costs.
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBDIN, District Judge.
This is a motion on the part of the defendant to retax the costs in the case. The defendant, who is the movant here, was indicted upon several counts for violation of the Interstate Commerce Act. He demurred to this indictment, and the D'istrict Court sustained the demurrer. He thereupon carried the same to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the judgment of the court below was reversed. The case then proceeded to trial, and he was found guilty on one of the counts and acquitted on all the others, and sentenced to pay a fine of $5,000, together with costs of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lee Injector Mfg. Co. v. Penberthy Injector Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Simpkins v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1894
- The PersianaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- United States v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Herrington v. FlandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Robert D. Pommerening and Cletus A. RedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Otis PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- People v. PalomoColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.