Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries which plaintiff suffered when defendant’s truck collided with plaintiff’s automobile. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit.

At the time of the accident defendant’s truck was in the possession of Prank Lovely, one of defendant’s employees. In the absence of rebutting testimony, this fact would give rise to an inference of agency.① *349The trial court held, however, that the inference was rebutted by the evidence adduced in this case. The evidence rebutting the inference was the uncontradicted testimony of several witnesses for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Luis v. MuhrbackOregon Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rogers v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. John S. Czajka v. James Hickman, Sheriff Clint Coplin, Deputy Sheriff Al Turley, Deputy SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Petro v. EMP. DIV., DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Wheeler v. HustonOregon Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API