Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1981No. 54PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant argues four assignments of error on appeal. We have carefully considered each assignment and conclude that the trial court committed no error which would entitle defendant to a new trial.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate the charges against him for trial. G.S. 15A-926(a) provides that:

“Two or more offenses may be joined... for trial when the offenses... are based on... a series of acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan.”

It is well established that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KoberleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. StrohauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. StrohauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. KoberleinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API