Legal Opinion

State v. Boltinhouse

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1980No. 8012SC523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for the State’s failure to afford him a speedy trial in accordance with G.S. 15A-701.

G.S. 15A-701(al)(3) provides:

When a charge is dismissed, other than under G.S. 15A-703, or a finding of no probable cause pursuant to G.S. 15A-612, and the defendant is afterward charged with the same offense or an offense based on the same act or transaction or on the same series of acts ór transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re L.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. KoberleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. LayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. KoberleinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API