Legal Opinion

Ken Moorhead Oil Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1996No. 24498PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Federated Mutual Insurance Company (“Federated”) challenges the circuit court’s denial of its request for reimbursement from a state-created fund, the Superb Account, of amounts claimed by Federated’s insured, Ken Moorhead Oil Co., Inc. (“Moorhead” or “Moorhead Oil”), under pollution liability policies issued in 1988 and 1989. Federated contends that the coordination of benefits clauses in its contracts with Moorhead Oil were a central feature of the insurance policies. Those clauses provided, in essence, that coverage under the insurance policies would be excess to any funds…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. G-H Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
  3. Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Mibbs, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API