Legal Opinion

Nelson v. David L. Hill Logging

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1993No. 19907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation ease. We conclude that there is substantial and competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s findings that the employee did not establish a prima facie case that he was an odd-lot worker and to support the Commission’s rating of the employee’s permanent partial impairment.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Albert D. Nelson was employed full-time by David L. Hill Logging as a faller. In the course of his employment, Nelson was struck by a falling tree which fractured his left leg. At the time of the accident, Nelson was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eacret v. Clearwater Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gooby v. Lake Shore Management Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lethrud v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API