Nelson v. David L. Hill Logging
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a workers’ compensation ease. We conclude that there is substantial and competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s findings that the employee did not establish a prima facie case that he was an odd-lot worker and to support the Commission’s rating of the employee’s permanent partial impairment.
I
THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.
Albert D. Nelson was employed full-time by David L. Hill Logging as a faller. In the course of his employment, Nelson was struck by a falling tree which fractured his left leg. At the time of the accident, Nelson was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eacret v. Clearwater Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Gooby v. Lake Shore Management Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Lethrud v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.