Legal Opinion

Lethrud v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1995No. 20721PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

Olaf Lethrud (Lethrud) appeals the order of the Idaho Industrial Commission (Commission) denying Lethrud’s claim for worker compensation benefits from the Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (I.S.I.F.). Lethrud argues that the Commission erred when it concluded that Lethrud failed to prove that he suffers total and permanent disability under the odd-lot doctrine as a result of his accident and injury of October 1985. Lethrud also argues that the Commission erred when it concluded that Lethrud failed to prove that he had a preexisting permanent physical impairment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Reiher v. American Fine FoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stoddard v. Hagadone Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRYIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Talbot v. Ames ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API