Legal Opinion

Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1989No. 17089PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case. The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether the Industrial Commission correctly concluded that the claimant (Huerta) did not sustain the burden of proving that he fell in the odd-lot category. We affirm the Commission’s order. In doing so, we clarify the manner in which a claimant must establish a prima facie case of being an odd-lot worker. We also uphold the Commission’s restriction of rebuttal evidence offered at a continuation of the hearing to determine Huerta’s disability.

*44I.

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Huerta…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Carey v. Clearwater County Road DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gordon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Francis v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bybee v. State, Indus. Special Indem.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gooby v. Lake Shore Management Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API