Neary v. Etenburn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court,■ Oklahoma County; James I. Phelps, Judge. Action by Sarah Etenburn against E. R. Neary, administrator of the estate of George W. Neary, and others to recover land, for damages, etc. Judgment for plaintiff, and certain defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEIDB, J.
This is the second appeal in this case, the former appeal being reported Etenburn v. Neary et al., 77 Okla. 69, 186 Pac. 457. The action was commenced by Sarah Etenburn against the plaintiffs .in error and a part of the defendants in error. The petition alleged that plaintiff was the owner of certain land in Oklahoma county and the defendants entered into a conspiracy to cheat and defraud the plaintiff out of her land, and by false and fraudulent representations induced plaintiff to trade her land for certain land in Arkansas, representing that the land in Arkansas was worth $8,000 and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Blasdel v. GowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Etenburn v. NearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Guest v. ShamburgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Beidleman v. BarrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Nelson v. PetermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Alles Boon v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.