Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Peterman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, O.

O. G. Peterman brought his action against Mathews Nelson, Rolla W. Coleman, and the Coleman-Nelson Corporation, alleging the defendants maliciously, unlawfully, and without probable cause, caused the plaintiff to be arrested by making and filing an affidavit before a justice of the peace in which they charged the plaintiff with the crime of embezzlement and caused plaintiff’s arrest and imprisonment, and maliciously and without probable cause prosecuted plaintiff; and then follows the allegation of his discharge by the justice of the peace at the preliminary hearing.

Matthews…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Dunnington v. LoeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. FreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Drakos v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Miller v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Bonaparte v. American-First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Oppenheim v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API