Legal Opinion
KEEVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Randall
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 20, 2005No. 22857-6-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
119 P.3d 926 (2005)
KEEVER & ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent and Cross-Appellant,
v.
William RANDALL and Jane Doe Randall, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Appellants.
No. 22857-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
September 20, 2005.
Richard T. Cole, Attorney at Law, Ellensburg, WA, for Appellants.
Steven A. Branom, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
¶ 1 Administrative time expended by a contractor is generally not a cost contemplated by the parties in a cost-plus construction contract. E.g., 17A AM.JUR.2D Contracts § 495…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In re the Marriage of ZiglerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.