LyphoMed, Inc. v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
We accepted jurisdiction of this special action because it involves a question of the interpretation of a relatively new statute abolishing joint and several liability, and of how the rules of civil procedure relating to that statute are to be applied. When we accepted jurisdiction, we granted the relief the petitioner requested and stated that an opinion would follow. This is that opinion. We conclude that each defendant who claims that other persons or entities who have not been joined in the action are responsible for the plaintiff’s injury must file a notice of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Bohonus v. AmercoArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Greco v. ManolakosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Scottsdale Insurance v. CendejasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Wester v. Crown Controls Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- Carondelet Health Services v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Soto v. BrinkerhoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.