Legal Opinion

Bohonus v. Amerco

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1979No. 14445PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellee Amerco, plaintiff below, secured a judgment against appellant Bohonus, de fendant below, and sought to enforce that judgment by judicial sale of Bohonus’ interest in a partnership. The initial litigation involved numerous parties and was prolonged. At the time summary judgment was entered against Bohonus, his attorney had withdrawn and he was acting as his own attorney. He attempted to appeal from the summary judgment and from the judgment enforcement proceedings. Before the case was transferred to this court pursuant to Rule 19(e) of the Rules of Civil Appellate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Graham v. AsburyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Aldrich and Steinberger v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Dunn v. Progress Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. FDIC v. Birchwood BuildersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API