Legal Opinion

Greco v. Manolakos

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented is whether it was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion to exclude all testimony concerning the amount of future medical expenses of appellant, Mary Greco, and to instruct the jury not to consider future medical expenses in its verdict. At the time of answering appellee’s interrogatories, appellant stated that she would claim future medical expenses, but that she was then unable to accurately determine the amount of them. She failed to amend her answer prior to trial. Appellee contends that this failure to amend justifies the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KaiserArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Allen v. DevereauxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Watson v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Larson v. MacIasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Fleitz v. Van WestrienenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. LyphoMed, Inc. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Olson v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Horan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API