Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 14, 1980No. 76-6895, CA 14475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*23RICHARDSON, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant is an employee entitled to compensation for his injuries. Claimant is a "freelance” jockey, licensed to ride in horse races in Oregon and three other western states. On May 16, 1976, he sustained injuries when he fell from a horse during a race at Portland Meadows Race Track. The horse was trained by Ernest Gruenberg, and was owned by Don and Gayle Hartman. However, the horse was registered at Portland Meadows as belonging to Mr. Hartman’s father. The apparent reason for the misregistration was to make the horse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jones v. Emanuel HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Clark v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trabosh v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Bell v. HartmanOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Renolds-Croft, Inc. v. Bill Morrison Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Bell v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API