Legal Opinion

Renolds-Croft, Inc. v. Bill Morrison Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1982No. WCB No. 79-3058-E, CA A20453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This case concerns the jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Board to settle a dispute between two carriers, Royal Globe Insurance Company (Royal) and SAIF. Royal seeks judicial review of an order of the Board which requires Royal to reimburse SAIF for an overpayment of benefits made by SAIF to claimant Reynolds, an employe of Royal’s insured, Renolds-Croft, Inc.

Reynolds suffered a wrist fracture in 1973 while employed at Renolds-Croft. Royal accepted the claim and processed it until closure in 1975. Reynolds suffered another injury to the same wrist in 1976, which was diagnosed as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Oremus v. OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Bell v. HartmanOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bell v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Broadway Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Holiday Inn ExpressNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Petshow v. Portland Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API