Legal Opinion

Rangel v. Boehner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0540PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Before the Court is [14] defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff Charles Rangel’s complaint, which seeks injunctive and declaratory relief related to his censure by the United States House of Representatives. Defendants have responded with a motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint on five grounds: standing, the political question doctrine, immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution, failure to state a claim, and discretionary dismissal under the Declaratory Judgment Act or under the doctrine of equitable…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charles Rangel v. John BoehnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. WheelerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Cenedella v. Metro. Museum of ArtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. West v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Sevier v. LowenthalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API