Legal Opinion
Constancio v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1986No. Civ. 24683PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff Frank Constancio appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5). Plaintiff sought to compel defendant California State Personnel Board (hereafter Board) to set aside its decision upholding his dismissal from employment with respondent Department of the Youth Authority (hereafter Department).
Plaintiff contends: (1) the Board’s implied finding he willfully used phencyclidine (PCP) is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the Board’s decision upholding his termination is not supported by its findings; (3) the Board…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Robison v. City of MantecaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Thompson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Anderson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fisher v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018