Legal Opinion
Robison v. City of Manteca
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 2000No. C031652PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, P. J.
After the superior court sustained a demurrer to his initial pleading, plaintiff Thomas Robison filed an amended petition for a traditional writ of mandate directing defendant City of Manteca to reinstate him to his position as “Refuse Collector Worker II.” This time, the superior court sustained the defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. We dismissed *455the plaintiff’s invalid appeal from this order. (Robison v. City of Manteca (Apr. 16, 1998, C027876) [nonpub. opn.].) The plaintiff now properly appeals from the subsequently entered judgment. We shall affirm.
Background
On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. GidneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marin Storage & Trucking, Inc. v. Benco Contracting & Engineering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Fogarty v. City of ChicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- DeVore v. Department of the California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marin Storage Inc. v. Benco ContractingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Dario Martinez-Gonzalez v. Elkhorn Packing Co. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.