Dauphin Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. Toyota Motor Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order sustaining appellee’s Preliminary Objections filed in the nature of a demurrer. We affirm.
On appeal, plaintiff/appellant raises four issues for our consideration:
1. Did the trial court err in its ruling that the dangers of consumption of alcoholic beverages were so obvious and well known to the consuming public, as a matter of law, as to preclude Plaintiff from proving that Defendant’s [sic] failure to provide adequate directions or instructions regarding the use of its product rendered that product defective for the purposes of Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Griggs v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- DeWeese v. Anchor Hocking Consumer and Industrial Products GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Soufflas v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Parkinson v. Guidant Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.