Legal Opinion
Janik v. Janik
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 19250PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*176 Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Barbara E. Janik, appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying its order of custody of her minor child from joint legal custody to sole legal custody in the plaintiff, Edward J. Janik. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) ordered her to undergo a psychological evaluation and to attend mediation sessions with the plaintiff and a court-appointed therapist, (2) modified child custody without sufficient evidence, (3) delegated its judicial authority to mental health professionals and (4) violated her constitutional right to an open court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ridgeway v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Schult v. SchultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Seymour v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Barzetti v. MarucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Gina M. G. v. William C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ruggiero v. RuggieroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Daddio v. O'BaraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.