Legal Opinion

Bond v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1997No. C2-97-719, CX-97-726 and C6-97-1016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

These three consolidated appeals are from orders rescinding driver’s license revocations. In each case, the appellant’s driver’s license was revoked after the appellant submitted to an Intoxilyzer breath test and the test results indicated an alcohol concentration greater than .10. In each ease, the district court rescinded the license revocation after determining that the Intoxilyzer test results were inadmissible because the Commissioner of Public Safety did not produce foundation evidence showing that the simulator solution used to conduct the tests had been changed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hager v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Ahrens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Kelzer v. WachholzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Source Code Evidentiary Hearings in Implied Consent MattersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Kramer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. ArdsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Roettger v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API