Kramer v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges revocation of his driver’s license on the ground that the breath test results from the Intoxilyzer 5000 were not entitled to a presumption of accuracy when the machine, without explanation, printed the wrong date. Because the Commissioner of Public Safety established that the normal testing standards critical for accurate determination of alcohol concentration had been met and that appellant’s alcohol concentration exceeded that permitted for drivers of vehicles, appellant had the burden of coming forward with evidence that the date error indicated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bielejeski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Source Code Evidentiary Hearings in Implied Consent MattersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Ellingson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. UnderdahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Abbott v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Bryce Edward Ramthun v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.