Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shkurti v. Withrow

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1987No. 87-1314PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Sections 1,2, and 3 of Article VIII of the Ohio Constitution provide:

“The state may contract debts to supply casual deficits or failures in revenues, or to meet expenses not otherwise provided for; but the aggregate amount of such debts, direct and contingent, whether contracted by virtue of one or more acts of the general assembly, or at different periods of time, shall never exceed seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars; and the money, arising from the creation of such debts, shall be applied to the purpose for which it was obtained, or to repay the debts so contracted, and to no other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Crick v. RashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Castleberry v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board v. WithrowOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Burger v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Marockie v. WagonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Funds Management Board v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. JobsOhio v. GoodmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API