Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1940No. 27770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

Since the issue in this case is made by demurrer filed by the defendants, it must be assumed for the purpose thereof that all the facts well pleaded in the petition are admitted to be true. The petition, which is very voluminous, sets forth the various acts of council, its resolutions and .its contracts with the United States Government; but the gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint lies in the following paragraph of the petition as twice amended:

‘ ‘ On J une 15,1934, said city commenced the issuance in installments of bonds issuable under said bond pro gram within said limitations. By…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Columbus v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Cribbet v. ZieglerOhio Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API