Commonwealth v. Feighery
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for second degree murder, possession of an instrument of crime, and criminal conspiracy. Appellant contends that his statement to the police should have been suppressed because it was obtained in violation of the six-hour rule announced by our Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Davenport, 471 Pa. 278, 370 A.2d 301 (1977). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court below.
On September 12, 1982, a warrant for appellant’s arrest was issued in Philadelphia on charges of murder, robbery, possession of an instrument of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. FeigherySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987