Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Feighery

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1986No. 02192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for second degree murder, possession of an instrument of crime, and criminal conspiracy. Appellant contends that his statement to the police should have been suppressed because it was obtained in violation of the six-hour rule announced by our Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Davenport, 471 Pa. 278, 370 A.2d 301 (1977). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court below.

On September 12, 1982, a warrant for appellant’s arrest was issued in Philadelphia on charges of murder, robbery, possession of an instrument of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. FeigherySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API