Commonwealth v. D'Amato
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
Joseph Carmen D’Amato, appellant, was convicted by a jury of murder of the first degree and sentenced by that jury to death. He now brings a direct appeal to this Court 1 challenging the determination by the suppression court that his confession was admissible at trial, asserting that he was denied a fair trial due to certain allegedly improper remarks by the prosecutor, and claiming that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm the conviction and the judgment of sentence of death. The record discloses the following.
Several…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.