Legal Opinion
Graham v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 11, 2003No. 28181-3-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
The State appeals from an order restoring Todd Graham’s right to own and possess a firearm, arguing that the trial court incorrectly interpreted RCW 9.41.040. We agree and reverse.
FACTS1
On May 5, 1995, Graham was convicted of second degree child rape, a sex offense and a class A felony. RCW 9A-.44.076. He had not been convicted of any felonies, gross misdemeanors, or misdemeanors before or after May 5.
On September 20, 2001, Graham petitioned the superior court under RCW 9.41.040 for restoration of his right to own and possess firearms. He argued that the statute allows an individual to have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. R.P.H.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MihaliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MIHALICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.