Legal Opinion

State v. Hunter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 20, 2008No. 60552-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dwyer, A.C.J.

¶1 Ryan Hunter was prohibited from possessing firearms after, as a juvenile, he pleaded guilty to having repeated forced sexual contact with his two younger sisters. Now an adult, Hunter appeals from the superior court’s denial of his petition to restore his right to possess firearms. Hunter contends both that the trial court was required to grant his petition and that, if it was not, the statute mandating this result is unconstitutional. However, because Hunter is both a class A felon and a sex offender, the trial court had no authority to grant his petition. The statute…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RaleighCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. State v. RaleighCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. MihaliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. MIHALICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API