Legal Opinion

Cavitt v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1990No. 90-AB-8; CA A63767PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*83RIGGS, J.

The Employment Appeals Board ruled that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause under ORS 657.176(2)(c) and, therefore, denied him unemployment compensation. We review to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support EAB’s findings and whether there is a rational connection between its findings and its conclusions. Ruiz v. Employment Division, 83 Or App 609, 611, 733 P2d 51 (1987).

EAB found that, in early May, 1989, claimant’s paycheck was returned for non-sufficient funds, but was later made good by employer. On August 31, 1989, claimant received his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruiz v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. Clancy Bedspreads & Draperies v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Marian Estates v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Tyler v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Cavitt v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API