Legal Opinion

Pinto v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. 92-AB-1057-A; CA A76336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order denying his claim for unemployment benefits. We affirm.

Claimant is a sheet metal worker with 23 years of union experience. In November 1991, he was dispatched to work for Keystone Contracting, Inc., where he installed exterior siding on a mill in Camas, Washington. The mill was between 60 and 70 feet tall, and the panels of siding weighed up to 200 pounds.

On November 20, 1991, employer suggested a “timber hitch” method for raising and lowering the siding. The workers rejected that suggestion, and decided instead to clamp a pair…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bremer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Ruiz v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Stacy v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Stacy v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Uppiano v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API