Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoskins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 24, 2018No. Docket 16-1010-cr; August Term, 2016PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLER, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we are asked to decide whether the government may employ theories of conspiracy or complicity to charge a defendant with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), even if he is not in the category of persons directly covered by the statute. 1 We determine that the FCPA defined precisely the categories of persons who may be charged for violating its provisions. The statute also stated clearly the extent of its extraterritorial application.

The FCPA establishes three clear categories of persons who are covered by its provisions: (1) Issuers of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Napout Et. AnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Javier PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. HoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. BlaszczakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. FirtashDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API