Legal Opinion

United States v. Firtash

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided June 21, 2019No. 13 CR 515PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge

Defendants Dmitry Firtash and Andras Knopp were indicted in 2013 on charges *877that they made use of United States financial institutions to bribe Indian public officials. Allegedly, these bribes were intended to secure approvals for a mining project in India (hereinafter "the Project"), many products of which would then be sold to a company headquartered in Chicago. Neither Defendant has appeared in court to answer these charges. Firtash, a Ukrainian citizen, currently resides in Austria, where extradition proceedings are pending. Knopp, a…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Seun OjedokunCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. In Re: Extradition Application to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of September 10, 2021District Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API