Legal Opinion

Rogers v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 31, 1924No. B-16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHat, Judge

This is a suit brought by Maj. Wilbur Rogers to recover the difference between the pay and allowances of an officer on the active list from January 26, 1921, and the amount which he has actually received as an officer on the retired list under the provisions of section 24b of the Army reorganization act approved June 4, 1920.

The plaintiff asserts that the provisions of the act aforesaid were violated in his case; that the protection of officers of the Army which the act provided for was not extended to him, and that the order of the Secretary of War which was directed by the President…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Norris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Street v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Major Carl J. Sammt, R.A., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. Sammt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API