Legal Opinion
Major Carl J. Sammt, R.A., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 1985No. 19-1950PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
The United States Claims Court, 7 Cl.Ct. 274 (1985), held that it had subject matter jurisdiction over the claim of Major Carl J. Sammt, R.A., for back pay and correction of records, but further held that the claims were without merit. Judgment was entered for the government. Both parties appeal. We hold that because Major Sammt retired voluntarily, the Claims Court was without subject matter jurisdiction. The case is, therefore, remanded for the court to dismiss Major Sammt’s complaint with prejudice.
Background
In 1975 and 1976, Major Sammt was considered for promotion to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Richard J. Griessenauer v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Stephen F. Moyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Nickerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.