Sammt v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This military pay case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment, both parties claiming there are no material issues of fact in dispute and each claiming entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The issue, as framed by plaintiff, is whether or not he is entitled to back pay from October 31, 1977, the date he was retired from the Army, until the date of judgment herein, based upon his contention that his twice nonselection for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel was invalid due *276to the fact that his personnel file contained erroneous material at the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Major Carl J. Sammt, R.A., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Prochorenko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Hearne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985