Legal Opinion

Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 21, 1979No. 5-76PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs exception to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Joseph V. Colaianni, filed July 24, 1978, pursuant to Rule 134(h). The claim, as upheld by Trial Judge Colaianni, is for reformation of a contract for building reconstruction to correct a mistaken bid. Defendant before us has abandoned its opposition to the claim except as it asserts a right to interest on the sum awarded. After consideration of briefs and oral argument of counsel, this court agrees *520with the trial judge’s recommended decision as set forth below, and affirms and adopts it as the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Chernick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Ruggiero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API