Legal Opinion

Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 11, 1983No. Appeal 26-82PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Department of Transportation Contract Appeals Board1 (board), in which the board determined the amount of the uncompensated cost of performance of a contract, terminated for convenience, between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Essex Electro Engineers (Essex). The board found that Essex was entitled to an equitable adjustment of $124,709 plus interest, but refused additional recovery for burden and profit2 either on materials returned to suppliers or canceled prior to delivery. The board also held that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Granite Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API