Burris v. . Creech
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe law as it pertains to a “spite fence” was thoroughly pounded and hammered by tbis Court in Barger v. Barringer, 151 N. C., 433, 66 S. E., 439. Nothing can be added to tbe discussion there bad by Brown and Uolce, JJ., tbe one speaking for tbe majority, tbe other for tbe minority. 'The subject was exhausted in that debate. Tbe case was later distinguished in Bell v. Danzer, 187 N. C., 224, 121 S. E., 448. See 22 Am. Jur., 546; 11 R. C. L., 877; Hornsby v. Smith, 13 S. E. (2d), 20, 113 A. L. R., 684.
Without undertaking to thrash over old straw, or “to beat the same old brush with the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hornsby v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Worthy v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Barger v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Bell v. DanzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Meece v. . Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winston v. Williams & McKeithan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Hanna v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Austin v. Bald II, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Welsh v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Gaskins v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.