Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Todd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963No. 176PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Since the decision in Barger v. Barringer, 151 N.C. 433, 66 S.E. 439, it has been, ¡established law in this State that a spite fence is a private nuisance. A spite fence is one which is of no ¡beneficial use to the owner ¡and which is erected ¡and maintained solely for the purpose of ¡annoying ¡a neighbor. It may be abated, subject to ¡the same equitable principles which govern injunctive relief generally, ¡and damages recovered if ¡any have ¡been sustained. Burris v. Creech, 220 N.C. 302, 17 S.E. 2d 123; 22 Am. Jur., Fences, §§ 43, 46; Annot., Spite Fences, 133 A.L.R. 691, 720.

Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barger v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Daniel v. Birmingham Dental Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Burris v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Stroup v. RauschelbachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. D'Inzillo v. BasileNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Obolensky v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Austin v. Bald II, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API