Legal Opinion

People v. Rosbury

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1997No. S053191PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Terral Darnell McMillan, Edward Rosbury’s codefendant, was convicted of an attempted second degree robbery he committed in 1994. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 664, & former § 212.5, subd. (b), as added by Stats. 1986, ch. 1428, § 2, p. 5123.) He was prosecuted under the three strikes law codified at Penal Code section 667. 1 As required by subdivision (c) of section 667, the prosecution “pled and proved” that he had “one or more prior felony convictions as defined in subdivision (d)”—namely, a prior conviction for a 1993 robbery, a serious felony (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(19)). He was on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. WinslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. LainoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API