Legal Opinion

People v. Laino

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2004No. S103324PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In 1992, defendant pleaded guilty in Arizona to an aggravated assault with a handgun against his wife. As a condition of probation, he successfully completed a domestic violence “diversion” program in Arizona, which resulted in a judgment of dismissal. He argues that the Arizona judgment of dismissal effectively negated his earlier guilty plea under Arizona law, precluding its use as a prior conviction in the current proceeding. He also argues that the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., art. IV, § 1) precludes our court from deciding,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ex parte PueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. SoojianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API