Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. S033749PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

—Under the Uniform Determinate Sentencing Act of 1976 (Pen. Code, § 1170 1 et seq.), the Legislature has established an elaborate sentencing scheme that prescribes terms of imprisonment for enumerated offenses and sets forth sentencing “enhancements,” which, under specified circumstances, increase the length of a defendant’s incarceration. Certain enhancements specify a single term of imprisonment to be imposed upon all defendants subject to the enhancement, whereas, for other enhancements, the trial court is authorized to impose any one of three possible terms, designated as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. RayfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API