Switzler v. Robert A. Klein & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action for rescission and recovery of partial payment. Plaintiffs had judgment and the defendant appeals.
On the twenty-seventh day of March, 1923, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into an agreement in writing by which the plaintiffs agreed to purchase and the defendant agreed to sell and convey a certain lot in the city of Fullerton, in the county of Orange, known as lot 40 in tract 460, said lot having, as specified in the contract, a frontage of forty-six feet on Roosevelt Avenue, the purchase price of the lot being fixed at the sum of $1,850, upon which the plaintiffs had made payments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Baker v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Zlozower v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Walter L. Tally, Inc. v. CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Mobley v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.